wordpress-seo
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home2/speakcit/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114<\/a> By Megan Burks<\/span><\/p>\n The San Diego Police Department has released its first round of racial profiling data since 2001<\/a>.<\/p>\n Margaret Dooley-Sammuli, policy director for the local chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union<\/a>, said she sees “dramatic disparities” in the numbers.<\/p>\n Black people make up 5.8 percent of San Diegans old enough to drive, but they accounted for 12.3 percent of police vehicle stops from January through March. Hispanic people also saw a higher percentage of traffic stops than their share of the population, experiencing 30.3 percent of the stops but making up 26.6 percent of the driving population.<\/p>\n Officers were less likely to stop white and Asian residents. The trends were similar across most police divisions.<\/p>\n But Police Chief Shelley Zimmerman’s report<\/a> doesn’t fall on one side or the other of racial profiling claims<\/a>.<\/p>\n Echoing independent analyses of similar data from 2000 and 2001, Zimmerman writes in her report the department can’t draw conclusions based on the figures because it doesn’t know exactly who is on the road. It needs a demographic benchmark from which to spot irregularities.<\/p>\n The department settled on using estimates from the San Diego Association of Governments for individuals old enough to drive as its benchmark, but offered little analysis because of the data’s limitations.<\/p>\n “Although cities often use population figures as an estimated comparison, this is particularly challenging in San Diego, with its proximity to the border, designation as a world tourist destination, major military presence, and other factors not considered in population data,” the report says.<\/p>\n Criminal justice experts have long warned that looking at the raw numbers alone is problematic<\/a> because they don’t take into account such variables. But the thorn for racial profiling researchers is more typically accounting for higher crime rates and policing levels in minority communities<\/a>.<\/p>\n Columbia Law School criminologist Jeffrey Fagan, who crafted a statistical analysis that more accurately assessed racial profiling in New York City<\/a>, said police officers are right to advise taking their findings with a grain of salt. But he said he and others have set a precedent for working through the sticky variables.<\/p>\n Dooley-Sammuli said she wants to see a stronger commitment to make sense of the numbers in San Diego.<\/p>\n “Although we very much appreciate and recognize the department for making detailed data available to the public, their own analysis of it \u2014 to simply dismiss it as inconclusive \u2014 is very disappointing,” Dooley-Sammuli said. “There are some serious concerns raised by this data.”<\/p>\n
\nPolice Chief Shelley Zimmerman told an audience at Cherokee Point Elementary School in City Heights she’s committed to regaining the trust of the community at a March 26, 2014 town hall meeting. | Photo Credit: Megan Burks<\/span><\/p>\n